#Michigan #Candidate #RJRegan's (Robert "RJ" #Regan) "Rape" comment #OFFENSIVE? YES!* It was meant to be (he was PROJECTING The Left "just shut up and take crime as inevitable" stance in a mimicry fashion)! He was making a point. But, of course, #SNOWFLAKES distort his comments. You have to hear THE ENTIRE #CONTEXT about #Democrats #SoftOnCrime / #CrimeIsInevitable / The Left punishes Crime victims rather than the #Criminals stances "THAT IS NOT HOW WE ROLL" as he said. #CONTEXTmatters
#DemocratsCoddleCriminals #VoteRedToSaveMichigan #VoteRedToSaveAmerica
The Liberal controlled media will never engage in HONEST CONVERSATION about ALL OF WHAT HE SAID, why he said it, and the overall POINTS/CONTEXT!
* Should he have said it? Certainly NOT in the manner he did. However, you have to hear the entire set of comments to understand them. And, as he said that his words aren't polished like a double-talking smooth-talking Democrat like he is taking on, because he is NOT A POLITICIAN. Those eager to Vote for him, probably appreciate PLAIN TALK (rather than Political double-speak of a FASCICRAT or a RINO) and he promises (knowing the Liberal media is looking to attack his Citizen Candidacy) to be better in how he phrases things going forward.
The #FASCICRATS and the weak #RINO apologists siding with them, of course, want you to believe that HE is the one that would be SOFT ON #RAPISTS which is exactly the OPPOSITE of the point of his (IN CONTEXT) exchange was about. He was making THE EXACT OPPOSITE POINT - that HE would be TOUGH ON ALL CRIMINALS while the Left (his opponent included) are the #DefundThePolice and #LetCriminalsWalkFree crowd (despite the sham comments of #Biden during his #StateOfConfusion speech)!
The Left will repeat and distort his comment all across the USA now, trying to make Regan the TODD AKIN of 2022 (and as a smear of all Republicans). https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/robert-regan-tries-explain-rape-comments-saying-my-words-arent-smooth
Many GREAT CANDIDATES (MIAG, MIGov, MISOS, more) will be at our FIRST RESPONDERS event 4/19 (more at: https://www.12cdrc.org/news-1st-responders-event) we hope you'll meet/greet with them for one-on-one discussions!! eventbrite.com/e/honoring-area-first-responders-and-candidates-meetgreet-tickets-262308109617
I 99% (or so, remember Joe the Plumber, how about Durr? The Trucker that knocked off the NJ House (or 2nd in command) leader? and even though #Trump was #POTUS45 I still think of him as the OUTSIDER I AM SUPPORTING FOR 2024, etc) of the time SUPPORT THE OUTSIDER CANDIDATE(s). This shows why it cannot be 100% of the time. I am still supporting KRISTINA KARAMO (see: https://jlenarddetroit.locals.com/post/1446811/the-attached-advertisement-for-kristina-karamo-is-wrong-see-image) and any number of the Outsiders Candidates in the MIGov race (makes ZERO SENSE to pick one yet, until we see who makes the filing requirements/deadline) but heavily leaning toward Trump favorite Tudor Dixon. BUT, remember, a POTUS45 endorsement isn't INFALABLE! He just pulled his Mo Brooks endorsement, he should have never given in the first place, and he'd endorsed Luther Strange, MITT ROMNEY, Ronna for RNC, need I go on? He still is making TOO EARLY CHOICES based on BAD ADVICE OF OTHERS! Sadly, another reason why Tom should NOT drop out, who President Trump tried to appoint during his term to a Post that STABYANOW AND PETERS blocked (under USSenate Rules) or Tom would've been another one of the many Trump appointees in Office now/already! DePerno shows, again, his UNHINGED side (acting more like a ranting/raving FASCICRATS SNOWFLAKE than a serious Candidate) with this INCITING RIOTS/VIOLENCE! Again, said this over and over on the radio, in emails, in phone conversations, I could/would support someone, well I would have before this GOING WAY TOO FAR, could have supported someone with wild antics, hyperbole, etc, for MIHouse, MISenate, or even a Congressional seat, but he shows time and time again HE IS NOT A SERIOUS PERSON and unqualified to be TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OF MICHIGAN (while inciting Riotous behavior)! LET ME REPEAT AGAIN, said this over and over on the radio, in emails, in phone conversations, I could/would support someone, well I would have before this GOING WAY TOO FAR, could have supported someone with wild antics, hyperbole, etc, for MIHouse, MISenate, or even a Congressional seat, but he shows time and time again HE IS NOT A SERIOUS PERSON and unqualified to be TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OF MICHIGAN (while inciting Riotous behavior)! And for those who feel you cannot Vote for Tom for whatever reason, yes, I get it, he's been around a long time, he's certainly NOT A RINO but by definition of his long term Service is THE INSIDER in the Race, so Vote for that other (3rd) guy!! Hear David Kallman (of GLJC on with Ed Bonderenka about the MIAG race): https://anchor.fm/your-american-heritage/episodes/Your-American-Heritage-3-12-2022-w-David-Kallman-e1fkgjc Joseph M Lenard author: TerrorStrikes.info/buy 12CDRC, Wayne12, Committees member W12 Newsletter Editor (http://tinyurl.com/W12Newsletter2021-7) MICD12GOP http://12cdrc.org Webmaster Taylor (MI) Republicans Club (http://tinyurl.com/TRCMI) webmaster ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: margaret erle <m*******@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2022, 08:17:54 AM EDT Subject: Saturday Rant My Saturday Rant: Don't you HATE it when you have to get the GOP info from the other side?!!!!! This article was in the Snyde Report (gary@snydereport.com) (DEMOCRAT based) and was originally from Michigan Advance (DEMOCRAT based) - OH, I'm not talking about the STORMING part, I'm not even talking about the Meshawn Maddock part, (or Ron Weiser trying to persuade Tom Leonard to "drop out" of the AG race), I'm talking about the "15% Hard Working Republicans" part. Go to "Michigan Precinct First" Click on Conventions and there is no mention of this rule or how an outcome could be pre-determined by "packing" the vote. I have asked many long-term, smart, active, informed precinct delegates and everyone is familiar with the term, "Hard Working Republicans" but not the 15% (some thought it was 10%) or how they get chosen. JUST SAYING! In my quest to learn and be accurate about the information I share, if anyone knows where to find the ULTIMATE GOP RULES & GUIDELINES book, please pass that information on to me, and other eager-to-learn folks who are struggling! It's hard to help win the game when the rules are hidden! And while I'm on a rant, Who selected the people on the Michigan committee that voted NOT to use paper ballots at the state convention? I understand that some of those positions are filled by Party executives but I don't recall ever having had the opportunity to vote for or against the others representing (?) me. Margaret APRIL 8, 2022 1:41 PM Michigan Advance michiganadvance . com Republican candidate for attorney general Matt DePerno is urging his supporters to “storm” Republican county conventions across the state. DePerno, who received the unusual endorsement of Michigan GOP Co-Chair Meshawn Maddock, despite there being two other candidates in the race, told his supporters to register for conventions in each of Michigan’s 83 counties, where delegates for the statewide endorsement convention will be selected. During a rally last weekend with President Donald Trump, DePerno told his supporters to “storm” the conventions, and his campaign has set up a website with the same message. “Every one of you delegates, raise your hand right now. I need every one of you to go to county conventions on April 11. It’s time we storm the convention,” DePerno said. “And if you’re not a delegate, you still need to go to county convention. It is time to storm the convention.” The other Republicans seeking the nomination are former House Speaker Tom Leonard (R-DeWitt) or state Rep. Ryan Berman (R-Commerce Twp.). Republican precinct delegates and officeholders will meet at county conventions Monday to select who to send to the statewide endorsement convention on April 23 in Grand Rapids. The nominee will face Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel in November. Under the rules set by the Michigan Republican Party, those precinct delegates elected in the August 2020 primary are given preference to become delegates to the statewide convention. Under a “hard-working Republicans” rule, however, the county convention could choose to allocate up to 15% of its statewide convention seats to people who are not precinct delegates but would be treated as if they are. If enough elected delegates at a county convention favored DePerno, they could select to send non-delegates who would also support their candidate of choice rather than other elected precinct delegates who may support Leonard or Berman instead. Usually, candidates for attorney general and secretary of state would be selected at August nominating conventions, shortly after new precinct delegates were elected in the August primary. This year, however, the Republican Party opted to hold an early endorsement convention in a bid to give the candidates more time to build their general election campaigns. Michigan Democrats used a similar strategy in 2018 when seats were open due to term limits. Maddock also endorsed Kristina Karamo for secretary of state over state Rep. Beau LaFave (R-Iron Mountain) and Chesterfield Township Clerk Cindy Berry. Some candidates had already questioned the fairness of the convention following Maddock’s endorsements, leading some to speculate that a candidate who loses at the endorsement convention could continue their campaigns into the August nominating convention. “At the end of the day, frankly, I think it’s going to backfire on her,” LaFave said following Maddock’s endorsement Karamo. “Everyone that loses at convention is going to be upset by the appearance of impropriety, even if one does not manifest itself at convention. So I’m sure that when I win at convention, everybody that doesn’t win is going to be very upset.”
From the RJRegan campaign... Robert Regan for State Rep 74th District Anthony was threatened (elsewhere) for supporting me. His reply: Interestingly, you write that Mr.. Regan, winner of the primary election 74th District, made disturbing comments but you fail to say what they were. Isn't that being manipulative on your part? Why don't you write me back here, where the public can see, and include word for word, exactly what Mr. Regan said that is disturbing to you. That way we can have a public exchange in an intelligent way, instead of you just telling me that Regan made disturbing comments. Because if you get disturbed by the truth then that's your problem. However if Regan said things that are offensive that's his problem. So, again, why don't you respond right now, word for word? Then we can add you to the list of brave people who are making claims about what he said and are willing to be known as being offended by whatever it is he said. I'm very curious. Then I know what offends you, at least. After that, I'll let you know what I plan on doing. Other than that it's impossible for me to respond. Does that make sense to you? I'm assuming that you're an American, giving you the benefit of the doubt, and not a trolling communist. So you'd know how important it is to be accurate about somebody in making public statements about them. The law requires people to be responsible for public claims about others. Otherwise our country would be reduced to a place where anyone with a big mouth who knows how to stretch the truth, manipulate facts, and drop innuendo, would have the power to make policy. That would be a terrible place to be, don't you agree? So please get back to me as soon as you can. I assume Regan upsets most communists, pro abortionists and lovers of rigged voting? Are you any of the aforementioned? Do tell what disturbs you. Then I'll know more about what kind of man you are and what offends you. And one might assume also, that your reference to my name, picture listed on his website being a condition, that, as you say "might seem in Mr DiMaggio's best interests to remove...", is a veiled threat and not an altruistic overture. So you should clarify that because if I consider it a threat, you will be the first entry on a new list of people who are dangerous, and that's not a good place for you to be if you don't belong there. Other than that, I look forward to your publishing what was offensive. If you don't, then you are obviously a coward who loves gossip and misinformation. Regards Anthony D
[https://www.facebook.com/regan4michigan/posts/383264106947268]