#Michigan #Candidate #RJRegan's (Robert "RJ" #Regan) "Rape" comment #OFFENSIVE? YES!* It was meant to be (he was PROJECTING The Left "just shut up and take crime as inevitable" stance in a mimicry fashion)! He was making a point. But, of course, #SNOWFLAKES distort his comments. You have to hear THE ENTIRE #CONTEXT about #Democrats #SoftOnCrime / #CrimeIsInevitable / The Left punishes Crime victims rather than the #Criminals stances "THAT IS NOT HOW WE ROLL" as he said. #CONTEXTmatters
#DemocratsCoddleCriminals #VoteRedToSaveMichigan #VoteRedToSaveAmerica
The Liberal controlled media will never engage in HONEST CONVERSATION about ALL OF WHAT HE SAID, why he said it, and the overall POINTS/CONTEXT!
* Should he have said it? Certainly NOT in the manner he did. However, you have to hear the entire set of comments to understand them. And, as he said that his words aren't polished like a double-talking smooth-talking Democrat like he is taking on, because he is NOT A POLITICIAN. Those eager to Vote for him, probably appreciate PLAIN TALK (rather than Political double-speak of a FASCICRAT or a RINO) and he promises (knowing the Liberal media is looking to attack his Citizen Candidacy) to be better in how he phrases things going forward.
The #FASCICRATS and the weak #RINO apologists siding with them, of course, want you to believe that HE is the one that would be SOFT ON #RAPISTS which is exactly the OPPOSITE of the point of his (IN CONTEXT) exchange was about. He was making THE EXACT OPPOSITE POINT - that HE would be TOUGH ON ALL CRIMINALS while the Left (his opponent included) are the #DefundThePolice and #LetCriminalsWalkFree crowd (despite the sham comments of #Biden during his #StateOfConfusion speech)!
The Left will repeat and distort his comment all across the USA now, trying to make Regan the TODD AKIN of 2022 (and as a smear of all Republicans). https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/robert-regan-tries-explain-rape-comments-saying-my-words-arent-smooth
From the RJRegan campaign... Robert Regan for State Rep 74th District Anthony was threatened (elsewhere) for supporting me. His reply: Interestingly, you write that Mr.. Regan, winner of the primary election 74th District, made disturbing comments but you fail to say what they were. Isn't that being manipulative on your part? Why don't you write me back here, where the public can see, and include word for word, exactly what Mr. Regan said that is disturbing to you. That way we can have a public exchange in an intelligent way, instead of you just telling me that Regan made disturbing comments. Because if you get disturbed by the truth then that's your problem. However if Regan said things that are offensive that's his problem. So, again, why don't you respond right now, word for word? Then we can add you to the list of brave people who are making claims about what he said and are willing to be known as being offended by whatever it is he said. I'm very curious. Then I know what offends you, at least. After that, I'll let you know what I plan on doing. Other than that it's impossible for me to respond. Does that make sense to you? I'm assuming that you're an American, giving you the benefit of the doubt, and not a trolling communist. So you'd know how important it is to be accurate about somebody in making public statements about them. The law requires people to be responsible for public claims about others. Otherwise our country would be reduced to a place where anyone with a big mouth who knows how to stretch the truth, manipulate facts, and drop innuendo, would have the power to make policy. That would be a terrible place to be, don't you agree? So please get back to me as soon as you can. I assume Regan upsets most communists, pro abortionists and lovers of rigged voting? Are you any of the aforementioned? Do tell what disturbs you. Then I'll know more about what kind of man you are and what offends you. And one might assume also, that your reference to my name, picture listed on his website being a condition, that, as you say "might seem in Mr DiMaggio's best interests to remove...", is a veiled threat and not an altruistic overture. So you should clarify that because if I consider it a threat, you will be the first entry on a new list of people who are dangerous, and that's not a good place for you to be if you don't belong there. Other than that, I look forward to your publishing what was offensive. If you don't, then you are obviously a coward who loves gossip and misinformation. Regards Anthony D
[https://www.facebook.com/regan4michigan/posts/383264106947268]